Friday, January 15, 2016
Case in point: The exchange between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz over New York City. Ted got asked a question about what he meant by saying "New York values." The questioner (Maria Bartilomo of Fox Business) is from New York, so she had a personal interest in the question. Anyone with a brain knows precisely what Ted was talking about, and even Maria herself this morning in a separate interview acknowledged that Ted meant the liberal social values of the "coasts" are far different than what gets derisively called "fly-over country" by the coastal elites. But they made it sound like Ted was attacking all New Yorkers when his intent was to talk about the difference between conservatism and liberalism. Ted should probably have not specifically said "New York" because that left an opening for attack, and you KNEW Trump would counter it with an emotional appeal to the events of 9/11.
September 11 had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE HEART OF THE ISSUE—CONSERVATISM VS. LIBERALISM. But it was an emotional appeal, and logical fallacy though it is, it tends to work. Naturally, the media loves this stupid stuff over substance, so this is all they'll talk about now for weeks and make it sound like conservatives hate New Yorkers. Sheer idiocy.
From what I have read and the clips I've seen, I've heard that the actual course of the debate did have some substance being discussed. I'm glad. It's too bad that most people won't hear about that. They'll just hear that Ted Cruz "attacked New York" and that Trump "handled it brilliantly."
I'll say it again and keep saying it. Get the media out of the debate business, and get a few college/university debate teachers to moderate all debates. Hold several of them, and have each one focus on one or two specific issues. Hold them according to classic debate rules, and let the candidates actually DEBATE ISSUES. Air them on C-SPAN, with C-SPAN holding all the rights to the audio and video. Release soundbite clips where they're exchanging on issues, and refuse to release the moments where one of them says a gaffe or makes a statement that everyone knows was not articulated well or conveys a meaning that the candidate did not intend. Because I guarantee you. The media will not play the substance. They'll always go for the flash point because it makes good TV and boosts ratings. Even worse, those moments make most people angry to the point that they can't hear the most important things being said by the candidates, and the media makes sure they'll hear them over and over again.
We get the leaders we deserve, I'm afraid. Perhaps its time that the American people begin doing due diligence and demanding better. Perhaps its time the American people convey a message to the media, especially business owners who have advertising accounts. Demand better. Demand a debate where we can hear detail and substance.
Probably won't happen. We're used to "bread and circuses" now, and too preoccupied with our own lives to really pay attention until it's too late.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
Taking my personal political hat off for the moment and putting on the objective analytical. And I'll probably shock my fellow conservatives for being critical of Fox News Channel, but I call it like I see it.
I find it curious that FNC head Roger Ailes and several FNC commentators have expressed alarm over Donald Trump. Why do I find it curious? I'm glad you asked!
In my humble opinion, Trump's candidacy is nearly entirely a Fox News promoted creation. I have a memory, folks. For several years - before this political silly season ever started - Donald Trump was a guest every Monday morning on Fox & Friends to opine on the deep things of the universe. He was also a frequent guest on Greta Van Susteren's show at night (Greta is or was a registered Democrat, BTW). The Donald has gotten A LOT of airtime through the years.
When the political season got closer, the talking heads interviewing him began asking him about the presidency and eventually the question, "Donald, are you going to run? Donald, why don't you run?" Yada yada. So he finally tosses his hat in the ring and if you believe the polls, he's running away with the ship. And now the FNC folks find it alarming? Come on. Seriously?
I know many of my friends - people I love and respect - are on board with Donald and are backing him. That does not change my love and respect for you. You have the right to back whomever you like. But I spent years in the media watching and covering this stuff. I've been a news and politics junkie for decades. Donald is running himself as the savior of the Republican Party and the conservative movement. I do not believe that he is. He is a chameleon. A very gifted chameleon who knows how to play the media game, but a chameleon nonetheless. His "conversion" to conservative principles has come all too recent for my comfort level. I honestly believe that A: if he wins the GOP primary, Hillary Clinton will be the next president, and B: if he wins the presidency, he will deeply disappoint the conservatives who trusted him and voted for him. He is NOT a movement conservative.
One other thought - for those thinking Hillary Clinton might be forced out of the race over her emails, Benghazi, or any other skeletons? Forget it. Not happening. Attorney General Loretta Lynch will never indict Hillary, even if the FBI steps forward and says she ought to be indicted. Remember the Clinton machine has long tentacles, and they are very adept at collecting compromising material on their opponents/would-be opponents.
I do hope and pray Election 2016 has a better outcome than the grim one I expect. That can happen if we as a nation obey Chronicles and repent.